Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +7793%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1536
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
21W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy