NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM GRID K220Q and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K220Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+290%
8.945 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1536
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
