Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
12544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +1991%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
14080
128
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
600W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
153 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy