CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+260%
8.253 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
VS
RTX A2000 Embedded
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Unknown
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1536
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
2
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
3
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q
4
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
5
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
6
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
7
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
8
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
9
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
10
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy