NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe
+1264%
31.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1536
Shading Units
9216
128
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
