NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (10W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+257%
2.289 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GRID
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
