Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +74%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy