NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+442%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
128
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
