NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile
+872%
22.27 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
GRID
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
58
1536
Shading Units
7424
128
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
165W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
22 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
