Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +429%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1536
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy