Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +6%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
1344
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy