CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
VS
NVIDIA GRID K520Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+103%
4.666 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
VS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
1920
128
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
2
NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
3
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA GRID K200
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
5
NVIDIA Tesla K40t vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
6
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
7
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
8
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
9
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
10
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy