Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M10 8Q
1.672 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +726%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
7680
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GM107-570-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy