CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
VS
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M10 8Q
1.672 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+726%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
VS
Arctic Sound 2T
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
7680
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GM107-570-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
2
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
3
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
4
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
5
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
6
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
8
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
9
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
10
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Related News
1
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
2
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
3
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
4
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
5
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
6
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
7
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
8
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
9
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
10
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy