Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M10 8Q +62%
1.672 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
448
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
247W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF110
GM107-570-A2
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy