NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
GRID K200
+36%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jun 2013
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
