NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
+244%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jun 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
142W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
