NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
+248%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Oct 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
62W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
