Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1700MHz vs 1306MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
13440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +2763%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
Nov 2021
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
14080
40
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy