NVIDIA GRID M40 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M40 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+2753%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Dec 2021
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
793.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
24.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
