Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 4A
4.825 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +205%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
8192
128
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy