Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs H200 SXM

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs H200 SXM

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A and a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 700W)
H200 SXM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1980MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4800GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 4A
4.825 TFLOPS
H200 SXM +1288%
67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2023
GRID
Generation
Hopper
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
1590 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
4800GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
16896
128
TMUs
528
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1979 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
67 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GH200
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
80 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
700W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
9.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy