Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1178MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 4A +235%
4.825 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
68W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy