Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1178MHz vs 771MHz)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 4A +35%
4.825 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy