Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
4560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16 +11807%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
6
4608
Shading Units
48
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GT216
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy