Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16 +3844%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy