Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1620MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16 +287%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
16
4608
Shading Units
1024
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
TU117
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy