Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4 +15975%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G84
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy