Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (151W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +98%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.956 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
151W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy