Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R7 360
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1550MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+47%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2015
H3C Graphics
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.08 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
