Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2130MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+403%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Feb 2024
H3C Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
70W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
