Home GPU Comparison Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

Intel HD Graphics 2000 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 2000 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (2200MHz vs 1000MHz)
848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 2000
0.096 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile +4006%
3.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
HD Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

650 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
896
6
TMUs
56
1
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Sandy Bridge GT1
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 6.0
Architecture
Xe-LPG
Intel
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.504 billion
Transistors
Unknown
131 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy