Home GPU Comparison Intel HD Graphics 400 vs AMD FirePro A300

Intel HD Graphics 400 vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 400 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel HD Graphics 400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (6W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (905MHz vs 600MHz)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 400
0.115 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +504%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-T
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

320 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
96
Shading Units
384
12
TMUs
24
2
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
115.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
28.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

6W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Braswell GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 8.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.3
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy