Home GPU Comparison Intel HD Graphics 400 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP

Intel HD Graphics 400 vs ATI Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 400 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel HD Graphics 400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock600MHz
56 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 400 +283%
0.115 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP
0.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2015
Release Date
Nov 2009
HD Graphics-T
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

320 MHz
Base Clock
-
600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
96
Shading Units
40
12
TMUs
4
2
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.520 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.520 GTexel/s
-
-
-
115.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.40 GFLOPS
28.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

6W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Braswell GT1
GPU Name
RS780
-
GPU Variant
RS780M
Generation 8.0
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
-
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.3
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.0
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy