Intel Arc 140V vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (2350MHz vs 2050MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arc 140V
4.1 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+17%
4.813 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Intel Arc 140V
+5%
4222
Arc 140T Mobile
4012
Graphics Card
Sep 2024
Release Date
Jan 2025
Battlemage
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
LPDDR5x
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
Tensor Cores
128
8
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
0
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
GPU Variant
-
Xe2
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12.2
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
