Intel Arc 140V vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (2050MHz vs 921MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 15W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arc 140V
+1637%
4.1 TFLOPS
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2024
Release Date
May 2019
Battlemage
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
640 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
921 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
LPDDR5x
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
0
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
10W
W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
Outputs
No outputs
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Name
GM20B
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
Xe2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
20 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12.2
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
