Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+2972%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
62W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
