Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +2972%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
62W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy