Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +14%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 8
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
8192
Shading Units
4608
256
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
260W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy