Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+392%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
