Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +386%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
160bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
8192
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy