Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1747MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+64%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8.945 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
8192
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
160
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
