Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (231W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +1334%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000 SDI
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
231W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video 2x SDI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy