Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Quadro Plex 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1154%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 7000
1.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.37 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.74 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1176 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
587.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
600W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DVI
2x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
