Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 604.8GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+47%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
8192
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
