Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1007%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
