Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+2271%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
8192
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
800W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
