Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs AMD EPYC 9454P

VS

Intel Xeon E5-2640 AMD EPYC 9454P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 2640 with 6 cores 2.5GHz and AMD EPYC 9454P with 48 cores 2.75GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5-2640 's Advantages

Lower TDP (95W vs 290W)

AMD EPYC 9454P 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 8 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR3)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)

Higher base frequency (2.75GHz vs 2.5GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 15MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Xeon E5 2640

800

AMD EPYC 9454P +168%

2144

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Xeon E5 2640

3177

AMD EPYC 9454P +469%

18095

Intel Xeon E5 2640

VS

AMD EPYC 9454P

General Parameters

Mar 2012

Release Date

Nov 2022

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Server

Type

Server

-

Instruction Set

-

Sandy Bridge-EP

Core Architecture

Genoa

-

Processor Number

-

Intel Socket 2011

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-EP)

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

2.27 billions

Transistor Count

52.56 billions

32 nm

Manufacturing Process

5 nm

Intel Socket 2011

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

95 W

Power Consumption

290 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Intel

Foundry

TSMC

435 mm²

Die Size

8x72 mm²

-

I/O Process Size

6 nm

-

I/O Die Size

397 mm²

FC-LGA10

Package

FC-LGA6096

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

-

Performance Core Threads

-

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.75 GHz

3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.8 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

-

Efficiency Core Threads

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

6

Total Core Count

48

12

Total Thread Count

96

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

25.0

Multiplier

27.5

64 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

1 MB per core

15 MB shared

L3 Cache

256 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

CCDs

-

Cores per CCD

-

2

SMP

1

-

AVX-512 FMA Ports

-

HBM

-

Memory Parameters

DDR3

Memory Types

DDR5-4800

-

Max Memory Size

-

4

Max Memory Channels

12

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

-

GPU Base Frequency

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

Shader Units

-

Texture Units

-

Raster Operation Units

-

Execution Units

-

Power Consumption

-

Max Resolution

-

Graphics Performance

-

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

-

Theoretical performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

-

3

PCIe Version

5

-

PCIe Lanes

128

-

Extended Instruction Set

-

UPI Links

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8468V

2

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon E5-4650 v3

3

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs AMD Opteron 6386 SE

4

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101

5

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon E3-1240L v5

6

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon D-1520

7

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7250

8

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2

9

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5

10

Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs Intel Xeon w5-2455X

Related News

1

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

2

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

3

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

4

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

5

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

6

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

7

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

8

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

9

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

10

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time