Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon W-2175

VS

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 Intel Xeon W-2175

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 2650L v3 with 12 cores 1.8GHz and Intel Xeon W 2175 with 14 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 's Advantages

Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 19.25MB)

Lower TDP (65W vs 140W)

Intel Xeon W-2175 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 1 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-2666 vs DDR4-2133)

Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.8GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Xeon E5 2650L v3

590

Intel Xeon W 2175 +125%

1328

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Xeon E5 2650L v3

5365

Intel Xeon W 2175 +62%

8725

Intel Xeon E5 2650L v3

VS

Intel Xeon W 2175

General Parameters

Sep 2014

Release Date

Oct 2017

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Server

Type

Server

-

Instruction Set

-

Haswell-EP

Core Architecture

Skylake-W

-

Processor Number

-

Intel Socket 2011-3

Socket

Intel Socket 2066

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)

Generation

Xeon W (Skylake-W)

Package

2.6 billions

Transistor Count

-

22 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

Intel Socket 2011-3

Socket

Intel Socket 2066

65 W

Power Consumption

140 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

Peak Operating Temperature

66 °C

Intel

Foundry

Intel

356 mm²

Die Size

484 mm²

-

I/O Process Size

-

I/O Die Size

-

FC-LGA12A

Package

FC-LGA2066

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

-

Performance Core Threads

-

1.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.3 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

-

Efficiency Core Threads

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

12

Total Core Count

14

24

Total Thread Count

28

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

18.0

Multiplier

25.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

1 MB per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

19.25 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

CCDs

-

Cores per CCD

-

2

SMP

1

-

AVX-512 FMA Ports

2

-

HBM

-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2133

Memory Types

DDR4-2666

-

Max Memory Size

-

4

Max Memory Channels

4

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

-

GPU Base Frequency

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

Shader Units

-

Texture Units

-

Raster Operation Units

-

Execution Units

-

Power Consumption

-

Max Resolution

-

Graphics Performance

-

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

-

Theoretical performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

-

3

PCIe Version

3

40

PCIe Lanes

48

-

Extended Instruction Set

-

UPI Links

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6418H

2

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5

3

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon W-1290

4

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon E-2278G

5

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2

6

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon Max 9470

7

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs AMD EPYC 7373X

8

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2643

9

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Intel Xeon E3-1125C

10

Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs AMD EPYC 8024PN

Related News

1

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

2

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

3

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

4

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

5

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

6

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

7

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

8

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

9

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

10

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time