Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs AMD EPYC 7252

VS

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 2697 v3 with 14 cores 2.6GHz and AMD EPYC 7252 with 8 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 7252 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR4-2133)

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)

Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.6GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 35MB)

Lower TDP (120W vs 145W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Xeon E5 2697 v3

1129

AMD EPYC 7252 +7%

1219

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Xeon E5 2697 v3 +21%

7221

AMD EPYC 7252

5929

Blender

Intel Xeon E5 2697 v3 +13%

182

AMD EPYC 7252

161

Intel Xeon E5 2697 v3

VS

AMD EPYC 7252

General Parameters

Sep 2014

Release Date

Aug 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Server

Type

Server

-

Instruction Set

-

Haswell-EP

Core Architecture

Rome

-

Processor Number

-

Intel Socket 2011-3

Socket

AMD Socket SP3

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)

Generation

EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))

Package

2.6 billions

Transistor Count

3.8 billions

22 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

Intel Socket 2011-3

Socket

AMD Socket SP3

145 W

Power Consumption

120 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

77 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Intel

Foundry

TSMC

356 mm²

Die Size

74 mm²

-

I/O Process Size

-

I/O Die Size

-

FC-LGA12A

Package

FCLGA-4094

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

-

Performance Core Threads

-

2.6 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.8 GHz

3.6 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.2 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

-

Efficiency Core Threads

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

14

Total Core Count

8

28

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

26.0

Multiplier

28.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

35 MB shared

L3 Cache

64 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

CCDs

-

Cores per CCD

-

2

SMP

2

-

AVX-512 FMA Ports

-

HBM

-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2133

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

-

Max Memory Size

-

4

Max Memory Channels

8

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

-

GPU Base Frequency

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

Shader Units

-

Texture Units

-

Raster Operation Units

-

Execution Units

-

Power Consumption

-

Max Resolution

-

Graphics Performance

-

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

-

Theoretical performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

-

3

PCIe Version

4

40

PCIe Lanes

-

Extended Instruction Set

-

UPI Links

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Intel Core i7 13700F

2

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Intel Core i5 10400F

3

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs AMD Opteron 2216 HE (F3)

4

AMD Opteron 2214 HE (F2) vs Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3

5

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8376H

6

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Intel Xeon E3-1285L v3

7

Intel Xeon E-2436 vs AMD EPYC 7252

8

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2

9

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6414U

10

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs Intel Xeon W-2191B

Related News

1

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

2

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

3

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

4

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

5

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

6

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

7

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

8

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

9

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

10

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time