Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8256

VS

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 Intel Xeon Platinum 8256

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Gold 5320 with 26 cores 2.2GHz and Intel Xeon Platinum 8256 with 4 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 4 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-2993 vs DDR4)

Larger L3 cache size (39MB vs 16.5MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Intel Xeon Platinum 8256 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.2GHz)

Lower TDP (105W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Xeon Gold 5320

1117

Intel Xeon Platinum 8256 +19%

1339

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 +24%

7285

Intel Xeon Platinum 8256

5871

Intel Xeon Gold 5320

VS

Intel Xeon Platinum 8256

General Parameters

Apr 2021

Release Date

Dec 2018

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Server

Type

Server

-

Instruction Set

-

Ice Lake-SP

Core Architecture

Cascade Lake-SP

-

Processor Number

-

Intel Socket 4189

Socket

Intel Socket 3647

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Xeon Gold (Ice Lake-SP)

Generation

Xeon Platinum (Cascade Lake-SP)

Package

-

Transistor Count

8 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

Intel Socket 4189

Socket

Intel Socket 3647

185 W

Power Consumption

105 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

79 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Intel

Foundry

Intel

-

Die Size

-

I/O Process Size

-

I/O Die Size

-

FC-LGA4189

Package

FC-LGA3647

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

-

Performance Core Threads

-

2.2 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.8 GHz

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.9 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

-

Efficiency Core Threads

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

26

Total Core Count

4

52

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

22.0

Multiplier

38.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

1 MB per core

39 MB shared

L3 Cache

16.5 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

CCDs

-

Cores per CCD

-

2

SMP

8

-

AVX-512 FMA Ports

-

HBM

-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2993

Memory Types

DDR4

-

Max Memory Size

-

8

Max Memory Channels

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

Yes

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

-

GPU Base Frequency

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

Shader Units

-

Texture Units

-

Raster Operation Units

-

Execution Units

-

Power Consumption

-

Max Resolution

-

Graphics Performance

-

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

-

Theoretical performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

-

4

PCIe Version

-

64

PCIe Lanes

-

Extended Instruction Set

-

UPI Links

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6530

2

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon Max 9460

3

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7210F

4

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon W-2145

5

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs AMD EPYC 7742

6

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon E-2436

7

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon E3-1230L v3

8

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon E5-4610 v3

9

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon W-1370

10

Intel Xeon Gold 5320 vs Intel Xeon W-3323

Related News

1

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

2

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

3

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

4

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

5

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

6

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

7

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

8

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

9

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

10

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time