Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs AMD Opteron 6386 SE

VS

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 AMD Opteron 6386 SE

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 with 38 cores 2.4GHz and Opteron 6386 SE with 16 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 5 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR3)

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 2)

Larger L3 cache size (57MB vs 8MB)

AMD Opteron 6386 SE 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.4GHz)

Lower TDP (140W vs 270W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 +294%

1679

Opteron 6386 SE

426

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 +167%

10559

Opteron 6386 SE

3945

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368

VS

Opteron 6386 SE

General Parameters

Apr 2021

Release Date

Nov 2012

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Server

Type

Server

-

Instruction Set

-

Ice Lake-SP

Core Architecture

Abu Dhabi

-

Processor Number

-

Intel Socket 4189

Socket

AMD Socket G34

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Xeon Platinum (Ice Lake-SP)

Generation

Opteron (Abu Dhabi)

Package

-

Transistor Count

2.4 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

32 nm

Intel Socket 4189

Socket

AMD Socket G34

270 W

Power Consumption

140 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

83 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Intel

Foundry

-

Die Size

315 mm²

-

I/O Process Size

-

I/O Die Size

-

FC-LGA4189

Package

-

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

-

Performance Core Threads

-

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.8 GHz

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.5 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

-

Efficiency Core Threads

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

38

Total Core Count

16

76

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

200 MHz

24.0

Multiplier

14.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

768 K

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

16 MB

57 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB per die

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

CCDs

-

Cores per CCD

-

2

SMP

4

-

AVX-512 FMA Ports

-

HBM

-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR3

-

Max Memory Size

-

8

Max Memory Channels

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

-

GPU Base Frequency

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

Shader Units

-

Texture Units

-

Raster Operation Units

-

Execution Units

-

Power Consumption

-

Max Resolution

-

Graphics Performance

-

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

-

Theoretical performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

-

4

PCIe Version

2

64

PCIe Lanes

-

Extended Instruction Set

-

UPI Links

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs AMD Opteron 154

2

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5

3

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6330

4

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Intel Xeon W-3335

5

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs AMD Opteron 6284 SE

6

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5

7

Intel Xeon L5609 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8368

8

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5320H

9

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Intel Xeon D-1527

10

Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7235

Related News

1

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

2

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

3

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

4

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

5

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

6

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

7

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

8

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

9

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

10

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time